90% Impossible
I've been reading No Impact Man for a while. Today he linked to the Riot for Austerity 90% Emissions Reduction Project. The concept being that rich countries need to reduce their carbon emissions by 90% in order to prevent catastrophe, so this project proposes some rules for daily living that could cut individual carbon emissions by 90%.
It's discouraging to me how utterly difficult it would be for me to follow some of their rules, if I chose to try. Especially this one:
1. Gasoline. Average American usage is 500 gallons PER PERSON, PER YEAR. A 90 percent reduction would be 50 gallons PER PERSON, PER YEAR.
- No reduction in emissions for ethanol or biodiesel.
- Public transportation and Waste Veggie Oil Fuel are deemed to get 100 mpg, and should be calculated accordingly.
Let's see. 30 miles of driving per workday, 5 workdays per week, and we'll exaggerate and say I work a full 52 weeks a year. That's 7800 of driving, assuming I don't do any other driving besides driving to work. My Civic gets about 30mpg, so that's 260 gallons of gas per year.
Now let's pretend I could take public transportation from my house to work and that it was also 30 miles a day (which it wouldn't be, because there aren't any direct routes). Using their 100mpg number for public transportation, I would still be using 78 gallons of gas, 23 gallons over their 50 gallon per person per year limit.
So the best way I could reduce my gasoline usage to the levels they're talking about is to move. Barring moving, maybe ride my bike 30 miles a day, or some combination of public transportation and biking? Maybe I could carpool?
I'm not sure of the math behind any of this, but I like that this project exists and that they're challenging people to see what the numbers could actually add up to on a daily basis. It definitely adds fuel (har har) to my desire to move out of the suburbs and closer to everything. But it's also kind of depressing. I consider myself a little bit more environmentally conscious and less materialistic than the average person, but according to these numbers, I have nothing to brag about.
![]()

Comments
I've been loosely thinking about my own footprint as well.
I doubt one could get to 90% quickly, because the surrent system of consumption and energy distribution is forcing one to consume: 50% of the volume of a packet of meat is the packaging; magazines wrapped in plastic (bound with some tryout-issue or folder or sumfin) is reaching new heights, etc. You can hardly get around it.
According to those I probably maxed out my energy-credit for this year just by posting this comment. A desktop computer easily has a 300W power supply, and a 19" CRT does 150W.
Next saturday I'm going to buy a water-saving shower head. I kind of feel, maybe unjustly once the math is done, that spoiling water is the biggest sin of all, moreso than energy.
I'm going to to see about converting that list to metric. :)
Posted by: Wil | 12:49PM, 06.12.07